>>>
>>> AF2016 (AF2016) писал(а) в ответ на сообщение:
>>>>
>>>> AF2016 (AF2016) писал(а) в ответ на сообщение:
>>>>> Если Росгвардия получит шокеры-это явное покушение на народ?
>>>>
>>>> ЭТО - покушение на его здоровье. Вот возможные последствия от применения электрошокеров:
>>>> Cardiac complications. The medical literature is predominantly concerned with assessing the risk that Taser deployment may result in death, predominantly through ventricular fibrillation and other effects on the heart. These studies have generally found the use of Taser to be relatively safe (for a useful overview, see the Braidwood Inquiry, op. cit.). However, a study in the American Heart Journal found that authors affiliated to Taser were 18 times more likely to find that the Taser’s impact on the heart is ‘likely safe’ than those without such affiliation.Some studies have found that the use of such weapons ‘can cause cardiac electrical capture and provoke cardiac arrest’. Particular sub-groups can be particularly vulnerable. For example, Multerer et al. highlighted the ‘arrhythmogenic potential of a Taser in otherwise healthy young individuals’
>>>>
>>>> The impact of the weapon on respiration. The medical evidence is somewhat contradictory, with one study on pigs showing interference with breathing and one study on humans showing no such interference. However, reports by the US Department of Defence and the Canadian Police Research Centre have highlighted increased risks depending on the placement of the darts and the duration of the shock
>>>>
>>>> The risk of a ‘brain-specific complication’ based on a case report of a ‘previously well’ police officer who was accidentally hit by Taser and developed a ‘generalized tonic-clonic seizure’. Although he had no further seizures, ‘a year later’ his ‘symptoms of anxiety, difficulties concentrating, irritability, nonspecific dizziness and persistent headaches ... (had) not completely resolved.’
>>>>
>>>> The risk of penetration by the probes. Literature has highlighted cases where Taser darts have penetrated the eye

>>>
>>> ЗлюкаАлекс (Aleksis44) писал(а) в ответ на сообщение:
>>>>
>>>> AF2016 (AF2016) писал(а) в ответ на сообщение:
>>>>>
>>>>> AF2016 (AF2016) писал(а) в ответ на сообщение:
>>>>>> Если Росгвардия получит шокеры-это явное покушение на народ?
>>>>>
>>>>> ЭТО - покушение на его здоровье. Вот возможные последствия от применения электрошокеров:
>>>>> Cardiac complications. The medical literature is predominantly concerned with assessing the risk that Taser deployment may result in death, predominantly through ventricular fibrillation and other effects on the heart. These studies have generally found the use of Taser to be relatively safe (for a useful overview, see the Braidwood Inquiry, op. cit.). However, a study in the American Heart Journal found that authors affiliated to Taser were 18 times more likely to find that the Taser’s impact on the heart is ‘likely safe’ than those without such affiliation.Some studies have found that the use of such weapons ‘can cause cardiac electrical capture and provoke cardiac arrest’. Particular sub-groups can be particularly vulnerable. For example, Multerer et al. highlighted the ‘arrhythmogenic potential of a Taser in otherwise healthy young individuals’
>>>>>
>>>>> The impact of the weapon on respiration. The medical evidence is somewhat contradictory, with one study on pigs showing interference with breathing and one study on humans showing no such interference. However, reports by the US Department of Defence and the Canadian Police Research Centre have highlighted increased risks depending on the placement of the darts and the duration of the shock
>>>>>
>>>>> The risk of a ‘brain-specific complication’ based on a case report of a ‘previously well’ police officer who was accidentally hit by Taser and developed a ‘generalized tonic-clonic seizure’. Although he had no further seizures, ‘a year later’ his ‘symptoms of anxiety, difficulties concentrating, irritability, nonspecific dizziness and persistent headaches ... (had) not completely resolved.’
>>>>>
>>>>> The risk of penetration by the probes. Literature has highlighted cases where Taser darts have penetrated the eye
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.weaponslaw.org/weapons/projectile-el...

>>>
>>> andkx (A4417880) писал(а) в ответ на сообщение:
>>>>
>>>> ЗлюкаАлекс (Aleksis44) писал(а) в ответ на сообщение:
>>>>>
>>>>> AF2016 (AF2016) писал(а) в ответ на сообщение:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> AF2016 (AF2016) писал(а) в ответ на сообщение:
>>>>>>> Если Росгвардия получит шокеры-это явное покушение на народ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ЭТО - покушение на его здоровье. Вот возможные последствия от применения электрошокеров:
>>>>>> Cardiac complications. The medical literature is predominantly concerned with assessing the risk that Taser deployment may result in death, predominantly through ventricular fibrillation and other effects on the heart. These studies have generally found the use of Taser to be relatively safe (for a useful overview, see the Braidwood Inquiry, op. cit.). However, a study in the American Heart Journal found that authors affiliated to Taser were 18 times more likely to find that the Taser’s impact on the heart is ‘likely safe’ than those without such affiliation.Some studies have found that the use of such weapons ‘can cause cardiac electrical capture and provoke cardiac arrest’. Particular sub-groups can be particularly vulnerable. For example, Multerer et al. highlighted the ‘arrhythmogenic potential of a Taser in otherwise healthy young individuals’
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The impact of the weapon on respiration. The medical evidence is somewhat contradictory, with one study on pigs showing interference with breathing and one study on humans showing no such interference. However, reports by the US Department of Defence and the Canadian Police Research Centre have highlighted increased risks depending on the placement of the darts and the duration of the shock
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The risk of a ‘brain-specific complication’ based on a case report of a ‘previously well’ police officer who was accidentally hit by Taser and developed a ‘generalized tonic-clonic seizure’. Although he had no further seizures, ‘a year later’ his ‘symptoms of anxiety, difficulties concentrating, irritability, nonspecific dizziness and persistent headaches ... (had) not completely resolved.’
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The risk of penetration by the probes. Literature has highlighted cases where Taser darts have penetrated the eye
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.weaponslaw.org/weapons/projectile-el...
>>>>> Это летальнее чем огнестрел? Закон не нарушай и будет тебе счастье. Ты так об этом печешься, как будто сам боишься получить вторую контузию разрядом. Надеюсь ты законопослушный и шокер грозит лишь тем, кто как и ты извращает действительность и передергивает все что видит.