> тока что, вот прям тока что закончил смотреть ла ла лэнд- какого хрена я не втыкаю в джаз, как ни силюсь- непонятно... > > фильм годный, музло- на любителя, и это печалит...
И фильм и музло ничего - в формате романтического мьюзикла же все. Музло - подходит, я бы даже сказала spot on - compliments the plot nicely. Кто не слушал- La La Land - Full OST / Soundtrack (HQ)
To make you feel a bit better about the Tories and this election (and by the way, I'd rather we were not having any Brexits and the uncertainty, I just refuse to let it bring me down)- actually business leaders think that it is a good thing - as will help to secure "softer", more controlled Brexit. By the way, the MPs in the Commons overwhelmingly backed May's call for the election with the vote in Parliament today - 552 "Ayes" and only "17 Nays". The article from this evening's Standard
Business leaders view snap election as chance to secure softer Brexit Business leaders today raised hopes that the early election will give Theresa May more power to deliver a “soft landing” for Brexit.
Economists and MPs who are worried about a so-called cliff edge said it was a chance to extend transitional deals and blur the edges of commitments such as cutting immigration and ending the jurisdiction of the European courts.
Although Brexit-backers were claiming a big Tory majority would empower the Prime Minister to crush “Remoaners” and impose a hard Brexit, businesses saw it as her chance to deliver a balanced package that would avoid economic damage.
Carolyn Fairbairn, director general of the Confederation of British Industry, said: “I think the important thing now is a pro-business agenda that helps to alleviate some of the uncertainty that we are seeing.” She said uncertainty about immigration and trade terms were the biggest issues faced by companies.
Andrew Lilico, executive director of Europe Economics, said the timing was perfect for City hopes of longer transitional deals. An election in 2020 would have fallen just a year after Brexit, putting Mrs May under pressure to reject deals that would have allowed EU influence to continue into the following parliament.
“The European Parliament has suggested up to a three-year transitional period post-Brexit,” he told BBC radio. “That would take us to 2022, and by having an election now she may be able to make a number of pledges to end things by the end of the parliament, such as free movement or maybe the European Court of Justice judgments, things like that, which give her extra time for agreeing transitional arrangements so as to smooth the path of the immediate post-Brexit period.”
Economist Jonathan Portes said a “more pragmatic approach” on immigration would be very welcome to business and European leaders.
“From an economic view that would make far more sense,” he said. The alternative, of cutting immigration to the tens of thousands, would risk “quite considerable economic damage” and probably not be deliverable, he added.
Wimbledon MP Stephen Hammond said: “This brave decision by the Prime Minister will give the country a chance to unite behind a strong leader to secure the best Brexit deal for the UK, including free trade, and not the so-called hard Brexit.”
But a leading Brexit-backing Tory MP insisted: “The Prime Minister will use a big majority to ensure there is a proper clean Brexit, and stop these Remoaners holding it up.”
22:18 19.04.2017
The election campaign is already underway. There isn't much time left. I gotta tell you - it's as if this country is "on steroids" in terms of political developments, it is just never ending "fun here.
> тока что, вот прям тока что закончил смотреть ла ла лэнд- какого хрена я не втыкаю в джаз, как ни силюсь- непонятно... > > фильм годный, музло- на любителя, и это печалит...
Да, кстати, джаз в фильме сильно опопсовел, так-то я в общем не фанат этого стиля, но по-моему в фильме о джазе джаза было слишком мало. Да и вообще настоящий джаз исполняется и слушается в живую.
22:48 19.04.2017
Redhead (Expat) писал(а) в ответ на :
> > Привет друзья! > У меня одной пропали на форуме ветки групп, Совета и Админветки? Я сюда зашла сечас через “Группы” – “Страница с обсужденем группы”.
Да у меня тоже левый столбец через раз работает с планшета, опять этот Босс что-то испортил.
00:25 20.04.2017
Redhead (Expat) писал(а) в ответ на :
> > The election campaign is already underway. There isn't much time left. I gotta tell you - it's as if this country is "on steroids" in terms of political developments, it is just never ending "fun here. >
I have a good news for you, too. On my Bloomberg radio there was a conversation about possible move of financial services from London to mainland Europe. They say, you need to look at Stamford Connecticut. For years, they've been trying to make it a capital of Finance, but ended up moving financial companies back to New York, because this is where "their troops" want to live. Same would be with London.
01:16 20.04.2017
Redhead (Expat) писал(а) в ответ на :
> > Привет друзья! > У меня одной пропали на форуме ветки групп, Совета и Админветки? Я сюда зашла сечас через “Группы” – “Страница с обсужденем группы”.
У меня нормально вроде все.
02:52 20.04.2017
эдельвейс (эдельвейс) писал(а) в ответ на :
> Доигрался Данилка!
В Америке началось расказачивание.
02:55 20.04.2017
OlUS (OlUS) писал(а) в ответ на :
> Ты же не думаешь что цель будущей России-продолжать бензоколонить?
Именно так и есть... Только, уже - в интересах народа...
> On my Bloomberg radio there was a conversation about possible move of financial services from London to mainland Europe. > They say, you need to look at Stamford Connecticut. For years, they've been trying to make it a capital of Finance, but ended up moving financial companies back to New York, because this is where "their troops" want to live. > Same would be with London.
The thing with London and financial services in general is that London has always been and always'll be the massive clearing house for currencies - the dollars and the euros are cleared here - it's a multi trillion per year business, there are people behind it from all over the world and it's not easy to just "up sticks" and move it to the Continent. London's position as the world's main financial centre won't change - it is down to the fact that the systems here have been established for years upon years, the timing (London being favorably timed in between New York and the Far East (Hong Kong , Singapore ,) You know, people here are remarkably cool about this. You see, when the UK did not join the Euro Currency - the situation was much much worse then - the interest rates reached 15% at one point, people were losing houses and jobs, the sterling fell so much it was unreal - it was locked out of the ERM (https://www.theguardian.com/business/19 92/sep/17/emu.theeuro). Everyone was predicting that it spelled the end of London as the financial centre, all was lost , the UK and the Continent would develop at different speed, etc. As it happens, London only strengthened its position as the financial locomotive of Europe and the economic growth in the UK has consistently surpassed that of the Continental Europe over the years. So - the main event happened then, not now. That's why people are more or less cool about it.
07:11 20.04.2017
OlUS (OlUS) писал(а) в ответ на :
> Что же теперь будет??
Ничего хорошего, теперь только позор и унижение!
08:13 20.04.2017
Лодку раскачивают в Америке,а тошнит только российских крыс)))
09:04 20.04.2017
Тётя Роза
Это громыхающее пустое помойное ведро десятки лет "борется" за счастье трудящихся. Отчего даже стал мультимиллионером.
